BY GUARDIAN REPORTER
22nd July 2009
Tanzania`s High Commissioner to the United Kingdom, Mwanaidi Maajar
Tanzania's High Commissioner to the United Kingdom, Mwanaidi Maajar, has cautioned over the belief by some investors that efforts to resolve the post-election political standoff in Zanzibar were slowing down and might not bear fruit.
Speaking in an exclusive interview with The Guardian in London recently, the envoy said the investors’ risk analysis was not an issue as such but she was worried over their general perception of developments in the Isles.
“The opinion makers are not worried about Zanzibar, but they are worried about the reform process. They believe our reform process is slowing down,” said the envoy.
“In my opinion, it is not slowing down, but we fail to let people know what we are doing,” she added
Maajar said she had read the investors’ risk analysis and discovered that “it doesn’t appear to be an issue”, elaborating: “The investors analyse short term and long term security concerns. When the elections draw close, there is usually some apprehension that the polls could breed violence.”
Countries scoring highly in the international arena economically are doing exactly what Tanzania has been doing since the 1990s, she noted.
“They are introducing commercial courts, which we have already introduced. All the same we are still scoring lowly in judicial reforms. We need to work on that more enthusiastically than on anything else,” said the envoy.
She was reacting to fears that last year’s collapse of the ‘muafaka’ (reconciliation) talks between the ruling CCM and the opposition Civic United Front might touch off unrest in the coming (late 2010) general election in Zanzibar and eventually drive away investors.
“Peace talks are good if they are home-grown. They become successful in the end. I don’t think there will be violence in Zanzibar. I also don’t think we should expect an agreement so soon, if we couldn’t reach one all this time,” Maajar pointed out.
The envoy also commented on the pace of Tanzania’s anti-poverty crusade, saying the country was “on course towards redefining itself” after undergoing a myriad of economic changes from socialism and self-reliance to free the market economy.
“If you look back, we had ujamaa (socialism) and self-reliance that aimed at helping bring home-grown development. We wanted to create a society that would help people to access free basic services such as education and health from the government,” she said.
“The economy was small and couldn’t support all those services, and so we ran bankrupt. If the economy isn’t producing enough revenue, the country is unlikely to succeed,” she added
However, she said the above facts clearly “show clearly that the issue isn’t only aid but the choices that we make as a country.”
She quickly added that President Jakaya Kikwete’s predecessors, meaning Mwalimu Julius Kambarage Nyerere, Alhaj Ali Hassan Mwinyi and Benjamin Mkapa, “were quite genuine and this was the rational choice at that time”.
Maajar also explained that the impact of the fall in remittances due to global economic crisis was yet to be felt very much in Tanzania because not many Tanzanians tapped resources abroad for investing or sending money back home.
“Historically, Tanzanians never liked to go abroad. They only started going out relatively recently. So we don’t have a big population overseas,” she said. She gave the example of London, where most of the people forming the large group of Tanzanians in London are students who traditionally leave after completing their studies.
The envoy elaborated that there were a lot of informal remittances by Tanzanians living in the UK, saying: “On the part of Zanzibar, we had people who were ready to talk to us about informal remittances. There were 14 million pounds coming from the UK to Zanzibar in 2007 through Western Union.”
On the war on grand corruption, Maajar said people in other countries didn’t necessarily judge Tanzania by considering the number of reports on corruption and other scandals appearing in the media but by the way the country was fighting the vice.
“International opinion makers always focus on what governments are doing about the vice. For example, people are keen to know what the UK government will do to ensure that expenditure-related scandals involving Members of Parliament do not recur because that is what matters the most,” she explained.
Whatever the government in Tanzania is seen doing to address the problem of corruption is perceived and treated similarly, she noted, adding: “And I think it has done quite a lot.”
During the now-stalled ‘muafaka’ talks following the results of the 2005 Isles’ presidential election disputed by CUF, both CCM and the opposition party had agreed in principle to form a unity government after the 2010 general election.
However, the ruling party early last year called for improvements on the modalities earlier agreed by the bipartisan negotiating team. The team had made recommendations with regard to the structure of the Zanzibar government, including the cabinet, and the possibility of setting up a reconciliation council.
CCM later passed a resolution calling for a referendum in the Isles, saying that would afford Zanzibaris the opportunity to decide on the matter. CUF has rejected the plan wholesale.